“If you feel astonished at my bringing man & brutes so near together in their whole nature (though with a wide hiatus) I feel still more astonished, as I believe, at your judgment on this head. I much wish you had enlarged your concluding sentence a little so as to say whether you consider the ordinary mental faculties so distinct, or whether you confine the enormous difference to spiritual powers including the moral sense.––”
Down. | Beckenham | Kent. S.E.
My dear Mr. Mivart
I must thank you for your generosity in supporting me to a certain extent inNature & for your interesting remarks.f2 A very good judge remarked to me a fewweeks ago that he thought your judgment on the zoological affinities of man wasmore to be trusted than that of anyone else; & I felt very proud that aninstinctive feeling (for I cannot call it a rational feeling, as I had notsufficient knowledge for that) told me after reading your papers that this wasthe case.—f3
If you feel astonished at my bringing man & brutes so neartogether in their whole nature (though with a wide hiatus) I feelstill more astonished, as I believe, at your judgment on thishead. I much wish you had enlarged your concluding sentence alittle so as to say whether you consider the ordinary mentalfaculties so distinct, or whether you confine the enormousdifference to spiritual powers including the moral sense.—f4With spiritual powers I do not feel concerned as a naturalist;but I cannot get over my astonishment if your remarks apply towhat are commonly considered as mental powers. I quite expect tosee you quoted as an authority that the mind in an ordinary senseof man differs more from that of an ape or dog than their minds do fromthat of a fungus,—if a fungus has a mind.—
I hate to differ so enormously from any one. Do not trouble yourself toanswer this,— I did not intend to write it— but if you publish any passingremark again on the point in question do enlarge a little.—
Your’s vy sincerely | Ch. Darwin